Italian Renaissance Domes

Filippo Brunelleschi’s Florentine Duomo has been an engineering marvel and mystery for more than 500 years.  How did the master goldsmith and sculptor create the largest masonry dome in existence?  It is an engineering feat that has not been accomplished since antiquity.  Brunelleschi did not leave behind drawings or construction notes to explain how the famous Duomo, part of the Cathedral of Santa Maria del Fiore, was self-supporting and constructed without the use of shoring (a system of supports) or formwork.

Researchers at Princeton University in the United States and at the University of Bergamo in Italy collaborated on a study that revealed the engineering techniques behind self-supporting masonry domes inherent to the Italian Renaissance.  Their findings were published in the July 2020 issue of Engineering Structures.  Their study is the first to quantitatively prove the physics at work and to explain the forces that allowed such structures to be built without the formwork typically required for modern construction.  The researchers posed two significant questions:  How were these large and beautiful structures built without the use of temporary structures to hold them up during construction?  What can we learn and use today?

The researchers could not study the Duomo in Florence or any others that were plastered over.  To help solve the mystery, they studied the dome of Santa Maria, in Ciel d’Oro, in Montefiascone (Viterbo, Lazio) and one of the side domes of San Pietro, built by Antonio Sangallo the Younger. These domes were not plastered and therefore showed the arrangement of the bricks.  The detailed computer analysis conducted by the researchers accounted for the role of each individual brick.  Their analysis showed that the geometric pattern of bricks was the lynchpin in making the structure self-supporting.  The herringbone pattern generated a spiral curve with perfect balance.  As Attilio Pizzigoni, a professor at the University of Bergamo and one of the authors of the study, said, “We have seen that each brick affects the balance and resistance of the dome”.

The domes of these churches were constructed with a double-helix of support that distributes and equalizes weight and thrust within the structure.  This herringbone system is called a double loxodrome, which was used after Brunelleschi by the Sangallo masters throughout Italy, including in St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican.  They were an evolution on Brunelleschi’s original single loxodrome structure.  While the physics of the structures is now understood, the origins of the technique remain a mystery.  Some researchers attribute the technique to an influence from Arab and Byzantine domes.  Others regard it as a derivation of the Roman technique called opus spicatum, in which bricks were tightly laid in a herringbone pattern without requiring much mortar.  This pattern was commonly used in ancient Roman and medieval fire backs in stone hearths to prevent corrosion of lime mortar that occurs from exposure to heat and flames.

What also remains a mystery is why the loxodrome method was not used after the 16th century.  But the researchers hope to resurrect these forgotten techniques.  They believe their study could have practical applications for developing construction techniques deploying aerial drones and robots.  Using unmanned machines for construction would increase worker safety, as well as enhance construction speed and reduce building costs.  There are also environmental benefits:  The construction industry is one of the most wasteful ones.  Using drone techniques for building large span roofs that are self-supporting and require no shoring or formwork would create a lot less construction waste.  The systems of Brunelleschi and the Sangallo Masters, concludes Pizzigoni, can be applied so that “even a robot can build a dome in this way…which is what they are already doing in America…making domes with glass bricks.”

Posted in English, Firenze, Foto, Italia, Storia, Toscana, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cicerone

Marco Tullio Cicerone (106-43 a.C.) fu statista, avvocato, studioso, oratore e politico romano. La sua influenza sulla lingua latina fu immensa: scrisse più di tre quarti della letteratura latina sopravvissuta. La scoperta da parte di Petrarca nel 1345 delle epistole di Cicerone è spesso ritenuta essere di grande rilevanza per il Rinascimento del XV secolo. A causa della sua padronanza della prosa latina, a volte si usa la parola “Cicerone” non per identificare un uomo, ma per nominare le capacità di qualcuno nell’eloquenza stessa.

Sebbene fosse esperto in molti campi, Cicerone riteneva  la sua carriera politica il suo risultato più importante. Tanto che arrivò persino ad ispirare i padri fondatori degli Stati Uniti e i rivoluzionari della rivoluzione francese. John Adams disse: “Tutte le età del mondo non produssero uno statista e un filosofo più forti di Cicerone”.  Thomas Jefferson riteneva Cicerone così importante che basò la bozza della Dichiarazione di indipendenza e modellò la comprensione americana del “buon senso” base per il diritto di rivoluzione, sulle idee di Cicerone.

Nel suo libro del 2001, “Cicero: The Life and Times of Rome’s Greatest Politician”, Anthony Everitt scrive che nessuno ha influenzato i padri fondatori più dello statista romano Cicerone:

“Quasi duemila anni dopo il suo tempo, Cicerone è divenuto un inconsapevole architetto di costituzioni che ancora governano le nostre vite. Per i padri fondatori degli Stati Uniti e le loro controparti politiche in Gran Bretagna, gli scritti di Cicerone furono il fondamento della loro educazione. Il primo libro di John Adams e il possesso più orgoglioso erano gli scritti di Cicerone.

“Cicerone scrisse di come dovrebbe essere organizzato uno stato e i responsabili delle decisioni del diciottesimo secolo lessero e assimilarono ciò che aveva da dire. La sua grande idea, che pubblicizzava instancabilmente, era quella di una costituzione mista o equilibrata. Favoriva non la monarchia, né l’oligarchia, né la democrazia, ma una combinazione di tutte e tre. Il suo modello era la stessa Roma, ma migliorata. Il suo esecutivo aveva poteri quasi reali. Fu frenato in parte dall’uso diffuso dei veti e in parte da un Senato, dominato da grandi famiglie politiche. I politici erano eletti dal popolo.

“Questo modello non è molto distante dalla costituzione originale degli Stati Uniti con l’attento equilibrio tra l’esecutivo e il legislativo, e i vincoli, ora in gran parte svaniti, che erano imposti alla democrazia pura senza freni”. I padri fondatori dell’America furono attenti ad evitare di costruire la Costituzione come una democrazia diretta, poiché erano preoccupati che la democrazia diretta sarebbe stata equivalente al governo della massa. Invece, i cittadini di ogni stato votarono per gli elettori, che a loro volta votarono il presidente. I senatori furono selezionati dalle legislature statali e i membri della Camera dei rappresentanti furono eletti direttamente.

Molti aspetti del modello originale sono cambiati nel tempo. Adesso è un buon momento per rivisitare la filosofia politica di Cicerone non solo per difendere la nostra forma di democrazia ma anche per migliorarla… cioè per riequilibrare i poteri del nostro governo e per cambiare la struttura del collegio elettorale.

Posted in Italia, Italiano, Politica, Roma, Storia, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cicero

Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 – 43 BC) was a Roman statesman, lawyer, scholar, orator and politician.  His influence on the Latin language was immense: he wrote more than three-quarters of surviving Latin literature.  Petrarch’s discovery of Cicero’s letters is often credited for initiating the 14th-century Renaissance in public affairs, humanism, and classical Roman culture.  Because of his mastery of Latin prose, it is sometimes said that “Cicero” was not the name of a man, but of eloquence itself.

Although he was accomplished in many fields, Cicero believed that his political career was his most important achievement.  He inspired the Founding Fathers of the United States and the revolutionaries of the French Revolution.  John Adams said, “All the ages of the world have not produced a greater statesman and philosopher united than Cicero” and Thomas Jefferson names Cicero as a major figure that informed his draft of the Declaration of Independence and shaped American understanding of “the common sense” basis for the right of revolution.

In his 2001 book, “Cicero: The Life and Times of Rome’s Greatest Politician,” Anthony Everitt writes that no one influenced the founding fathers more than the Roman statesman Cicero:

“Nearly two thousand years after his time, [Cicero] became an unknowing architect of constitutions that still govern our lives.  For the founding fathers of the United States and their political counterparts in Great Britain, the writings of [Cicero] were the foundation of their education.  John Adams’s first book and proudest possession was his Cicero.

“Cicero wrote about how a state should be organized, and decision makers of the eighteenth century read and digested what he had to say.  His big idea, which he tirelessly publicized, was that of a mixed or balanced constitution.  He favored not monarchy, nor oligarchy nor democracy, but a combination of all three.  His model was Rome itself, but improved.  Its executive had quasi-royal powers.  It was restrained partly by widespread use of vetoes, and partly by a Senate, dominated by great political families.  Politicians were elected to office by the people.

“This model is not so very distant from the original constitution of the United States with the careful balance it set between the executive and the legislature, and the constraints, now largely vanished, which it placed on pure untrammeled democracy.”  America’s founding fathers were careful to avoid constructing the Constitution as a direct democracy, since they were concerned that direct democracy would be tantamount to mob rule.  Instead, citizens of each state voted for electors, who in turn elected the president.  Senators were selected by the state legislatures and members of the House of Representatives were directly elected. 

Many aspects of the original model have changed over time.  Now is a good time to revisit the political philosophy of Cicero not only defend our form of democracy but also to improve on it…that is, to rebalance the powers of our government and to change the structure of the electoral college.

Posted in educazione, English, Italia, Politica, Roma, Storia, Uncategorized | Leave a comment