The Brexit Effect on Italy

If it had been an Italian election, there would have been British journalists in droves ready to laugh at the naïve and childish politics in Italy.  What takes your breath away in the Brexit referendum are the lies and exaggerations from both camps…in the British press and in the speeches of its leaders.  Some examples:  the existence of a million and a half illegal immigrants will cause the collapse the National Health Service in two or three years; a promise of 350 million pounds weekly to this service because there will be no contribution to the EU; the restoration of national control will increase 10-fold the ability to stop suspected terrorists; the spectre of 700 crimes committed weekly by EU immigrants … and the best:  there will be an invasion of Turkish immigrants if the United Kingdom does not leave the European Union.

Clearly, fears about immigration were one of the top issues among the voters.  What the election also revealed were the deep divisions within Great Britain—between the generations, among different educational and socio-economic levels, and between geographic regions.

But what is likely to be the impact of Brexit on Italy?  We don’t yet know, of course, particularly for the medium and long term.  The immediate fall of the markets was expected and predictable.  The European economy will probably be weaker for a time.  For Italy, one of the countries with the lowest growth in Europe and one of the highest debts, Brexit is not good news.  In the immediate future, Italy risks paying a higher price for Brexit.

On the export side, the United Kingdom is a major market for Italy.  In 2015, the trade exchange was 5.9% higher than in 2014.  If Great Britain had remained in the EU, Italian exports to that region were expected to grow at 5.5% in the 2017-2019 period.  With Brexit, the flow will probably slow.

Certainly there will be many changes in the world of business and other aspects of life, but perhaps not all will be terrible.  What makes people so uncomfortable is the uncertainty.  Could some banks leave the central financial district of London?  Could some automobile factories in Great Britain (Nissan, Honda, Toyota, BMW, General Motors plants) close and reopen in another EU member nation, perhaps to the East?  What happens to the 300,000 Italian residents in the UK?  What will be the future of research at British universities that are financed in part by the EU?  Will the English raise customs barriers, a repercussion for products “made in Italy”?

What will be the domino effect, politically speaking, on other European Union countries?  It is said that Brussels will be hard in the negotiations with the UK, in order to discourage other countries from leaving the EU.  Could the financial scenario of the EU have an impact at the ballot box in Italy in October when at play will be constitutional reforms, the stability of the government, the future of the prime minister, and the sway of the legislature?

It’s important to avoid scaremongering and bold-faced lies in the press and in the speeches of European leaders at such a time of uncertainty.

Posted in Abitudini, English, Italia, Politica | Leave a comment

Caffé e Pistole

Vi ricordate quando ho scritto sul culto del caffè in Italia?  Ebbene, c’è anche una sorta di culto del caffè in America.  Ogni mattina vedo la gente da Starbuck che stan lavorando sui loro computer o sta chiaccherando con gli amici mentre sorseggiano i loro cappuccini. O vedo pendolari che vanno al lavoro portando un bicchierone gigante del loro caffè preferito.  Sembra che ci sia uno Starbuck ad ogni angolo.

Ecco alcuni dati statistici da farci spalancare gli occhi che ho letto sul quotidiano La Repubblica dopo la strage a OrlandoPer le strade americane è più facile trovare un rivenditore d’armi che un negozio di caffè.  Il rapporto è del 6 all’1.  Ci sono 11 mila negozi di Starbuck rispetto al 65 mila rivenditori che nel 2015 hanno venduto armi da fuoco.  Negli Stati Uniti ci sono più armi da fuoco in circolazione (357 milioni) che abitanti (una populazione di circa 319 milioni).

Esiste una relazione tra il possesso di armi e la violenza da armi da fuoco?  Joshua Tewksbury, un professore all’Università di Washington, ha studiato questo problema.  Ha paragonato 75 paesi, e non ci sembra di essere una correlazione.  Gli Stati Uniti erano meglio di paesi come El Salvador, Giamaica, e Swaziland.  Interessante.  Ma quando ha limitato i dati a paesi simili agli Stati Uniti (in molte variabili), il quadro cambia radicalmente.  Di gran lunga, gli Americani possiedono pistole e le usano su altre persone (vedete www.tewksburylab.org.)

Non possiamo impedire ogni tragedia con leggi sul controllo delle armi.  Ma questo non è il punto.  Possiamo ridurre al minimo il rischio, e ridurre l’accesso alle armi lo avrebbe fatto.

Posted in Abitudini, Differenze culturali, Italiano, Politica | Leave a comment

Coffee and Guns

Recently, I wrote about the cult of coffee in Italy.  Well, there is also a sort of cult here in America too.  Every morning I see people at Starbuck’s working on their computers or chatting with friends while sipping their cappuccinos.  Or I see commuters going to work carrying gigantic cups of their favorite brew.  It seems like there’s a Starbuck’s at every corner.

Not really.  Here are some eye-opening statistics that I read in La Repubblica after the massacre in Orlando.  On the streets of America, it is easier to find a retailer of guns than a coffee shop.  The ratio is 6:1.   For examples, there are 11,000 Starbucks compared to 65,000 stores that in 2015 sold firearms.  In the United States there are more weapons in circulation (357 million) than inhabitants (a population of about 319 million).

Does a relationship exist between the possession of guns and violence from firearms?   Joshua Tewksbury, a professor at the University of Washington, studied this issue.  He compared 75 countries, and there did not seem to be a correlation.  The United States was better than countries like El Salvador, Jamaica, and Swaziland.  Interesting.  But when he limited the data to countries similar to the United States (on many variables), the picture changed radically.  By a long shot, Americans possess guns and turn them on other people (see www.tewksburylab.org).

It’s not possible to prevent every tragedy through gun control laws.  But this is not the point.  We can reduce the risk, and reduce it through reducing access to firearms.

Posted in Abitudini, Differenze culturali, English, Politica | 2 Comments